That is why I introduced my bill. I hear you. We need a national standard. I am just trying to figure out how we are going to manage it.

I want to acknowledge how you have been working in a bipartisan manner on the reauthorization of this.

I am supportive of this proposal, and I hope to see its inclusion in this year's user fee reauthorization.

I have grave concern for a couple of reasons. One is, of course, I want folks in the United States to have access to the best devices possible to maintain their health and safety, number one, and secondly, the medical device industry is…

I represent the University of Utah. They project more than 360 products having shortages and that many products by the end of this year.

I just introduced with Mr. Bilbray this week our track and trace legislation, pedigree legislation for maintaining the integrity of the drug supply in this country.

That is a major reason why I do not support H.R. 1925. It does not reflect the collective views of the many stakeholders in Utah.

If the proponents of the bill are truly concerned about protecting land in Utah, their efforts could be better spent participating in the new process as we move to other counties.

We will all be speaking on the same page

We proved with our bill that if we bring responsible people to the table who are actually interested in results

We have produced wilderness in Utah. We have done it in a short timeframe, and we are poised to do it again and again.