The Attorney General said very clearly, and she uses English, American, you know, in her letters, said, `No such inherent conflict of interest exists in the investigation of Members of Congress.' In other words, you investigate the Members of Congress on an optional basis the way you want to. They haven't had any trouble doing it. But you don't mandate that they do it just like they do the 60 members of the executive department. This bill is not designed to investigate Congress. They can do that anyway with U.S. attorneys all over the United States.
Jack Brooks: “The Attorney General said very clearly, and she uses English, American, you know, in her letters, said, `No such…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the investigation of Members of Congress and the role of the Attorney General.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
But I have never deterred from my route since then. It is these people that go back and forth that make you nervous.
This is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in an attempt to delay the progress of the crime bill. It takes about 25 minutes each time, 10 minutes for debate, 15…
Now, what I was going to suggest is I believe that the first part of the amendment is a useful statement of what is in the bill now. It is the second part that we have trouble with. If the gentleman would get unanimous consent to drop that…
We do not need any more amendments, Mr. Chairman. There are enough amendments now available on this bill, and I am trying to edit this to where it makes sense, to where it would be unbelievable that they would want to have any more.





