Mr. Chairman, I believe the procedures we have in the bill before us are appropriate, workable procedures for carrying out the death penalty. For those who believe that capital punishment has a place in our criminal justice system--and I certainly do--it is incumbent that there are procedures crafted to ensure that justice is done. Justice requires the procedures to be constitutionally sound--the bill's provisions achieve precisely that. They appropriately channel a sentencing jury's authority, so that we can separate out those killers who deserve the harshest of punishments, and provide for life without any possibility of release for others convicted of murder. They are tough, but they are fair. Mr. Gekas' amendment upsets the careful balance that is necessary to fully and fairly implement the death penalty. By double counting an offense as an aggravating factor, the Gekas amendment introduces a harmful degree of arbitrariness; it eliminates the jury's ability to impose life without the possibility of release if they decide against death. Moreover, the Gekas amendment mandates that a death sentence be imposed in certain circumstances--thus taking away the duly selected jury's discretion.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the appropriateness of procedures for implementing the death penalty during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
to my friend I would say that he recalls the difficulties. The testimony reflected in the hearings was that in some areas, where there is controversy about this issue, sometimes the officials in that area were not as industrious as they…
I rise in opposition to this motion to recommit. The Members of this body have spoken loudly and clearly on the application of the independent-counsel statute through the Members of Congress. They have voted, we have voted, this afternoon…
Now, what I was going to suggest is I believe that the first part of the amendment is a useful statement of what is in the bill now. It is the second part that we have trouble with. If the gentleman would get unanimous consent to drop that…
this is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in an attempt to delay the progress of the crime bill. It takes about 25 minutes each time, 10 minutes for debate, 15…





