this is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in an attempt to delay the progress of the crime bill. It takes about 25 minutes each time, 10 minutes for debate, 15 minutes for the vote; and that is the minimum. It is a dilatory tactic, plain and simple. It is just not my patience that is beginning to wear, but I believe the American people are a little tired of these tactics as well. If you do not want a crime bill, just say you do not want it. But I think most of us want the crime bill to succeed. It's time to move on.
Jack Brooks: “this is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing delays in the progress of the crime bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
I rise in opposition to this motion to recommit. The Members of this body have spoken loudly and clearly on the application of the independent-counsel statute through the Members of Congress. They have voted, we have voted, this afternoon…
Mr. Chairman, while I appreciate the gentleman's effort to provide a comprehensive solution to the problems of private security guards whose qualifications may be suspect, I have a number of concerns which lead me to oppose the amendment…
Now, what I was going to suggest is I believe that the first part of the amendment is a useful statement of what is in the bill now. It is the second part that we have trouble with. If the gentleman would get unanimous consent to drop that…
I am pleased to appear today on behalf of the Committee on the Judiciary to begin general debate on H.R. 4092, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The legislation is the result of perhaps the most extensive review of…





