I am pleased to appear today on behalf of the Committee on the Judiciary to begin general debate on H.R. 4092, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The legislation is the result of perhaps the most extensive review of policy and substance surrounding the complex issue of crime in the past 15 years. There is a simple, irreducible reason why crime--both its punishment and prevention--is the preeminent issue on the minds of most American citizens: it is because no force is more damaging to the fabric of national life than acts of violence against person and property. We cannot as a people be truly free when we live in fear; and there is none among us who has not at one time felt fear in the workplace, in one's neighborhood, and, yes in one's own home. Crime also has a corrosive effect on a society. By draining the energy and resources of the Government from more productive pursuits, crime stifles economic progress and impedes the development of a standard of living to allow our citizens to enjoy the fruits of their labor, and their freedom as Americans. The omnibus legislation before you is carefully balanced: it's hardnosed about punishment yet forward looking in seeking to prevent a whole new generation from going down the wrong road. We can do no less. From the outset, our purpose has been to construct a bill that can reach the President's desk and not be a hodge-podge of ill-conceived initiatives.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 during a Judiciary Committee debate.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
we have now reached the end of the day on the issue before us. The general debate time has allowed every possible argument to be aired by the proponents who seem to have no qualms whatsoever about taking a simplistic approach to a very…
Mr. Chairman, the amendment I am offering to the crime bill will establish a Police Corps program to provide college students with aid for education in return for serving 4 years with a State or local law enforcement agency. This amendment…
This section is included in the Hyde amendment substitute, and I would hope that we could resolve it in that overall context and not in a long, separate vote in contention here on the floor. We have got three or four, at least, additional…
I applaud the apparent goal of the gentleman from New Jersey to insure that Federal prisoners do attain a high school education. We all agree on that. But I want to review the facts. Since 1981, all Federal prisoners who do not have a high…





