I applaud the apparent goal of the gentleman from New Jersey to insure that Federal prisoners do attain a high school education. We all agree on that. But I want to review the facts. Since 1981, all Federal prisoners who do not have a high school diploma or its equivalent have been and continue to be required by the Bureau of Prisons to enroll in a literacy program for 120 days already. And if a prisoner has a documented disability precluding educational participation or progress, then a warden can waive the mandatory education requirement for that individual with no penalties. That is as it should be. I think there is now room to consider all this in the amendment, we certainly will review it carefully during conference. The bureau's existing mandatory education system is an undisputed, proven success. In fiscal year 1993, 12,447 inmates were newly enrolled in the GED classes; 33,419 were enrolled in adult continuing education classes. I think this is useful. Now, we really do not want to create a system where white-collar criminals can accrue good time, and poor, uneducated white or minorities cannot.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for an amendment related to education for Federal prisoners.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
The Conference Committee on S. 636 reported back to us a product that merges the Senate and the House-passed bills in a very careful, balanced fashion. Thus, the Senate's protections against interfering with the exercise of religious…
Mr. Chairman, the amendment I am offering to the crime bill will establish a Police Corps program to provide college students with aid for education in return for serving 4 years with a State or local law enforcement agency. This amendment…
We do not need any more amendments, Mr. Chairman. There are enough amendments now available on this bill, and I am trying to edit this to where it makes sense, to where it would be unbelievable that they would want to have any more.
Mr. Chairman, while I appreciate the gentleman's effort to provide a comprehensive solution to the problems of private security guards whose qualifications may be suspect, I have a number of concerns which lead me to oppose the amendment…





