We do not need any more amendments, Mr. Chairman. There are enough amendments now available on this bill, and I am trying to edit this to where it makes sense, to where it would be unbelievable that they would want to have any more.
Jack Brooks: “We do not need any more amendments, Mr. Chairman. There are enough amendments now available on this bill, and I am…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the number of amendments to a bill during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
This is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in an attempt to delay the progress of the crime bill. It takes about 25 minutes each time, 10 minutes for debate, 15…
The Attorney General said very clearly, and she uses English, American, you know, in her letters, said, `No such inherent conflict of interest exists in the investigation of Members of Congress.' In other words, you investigate the Members…
She makes all the judgments at this point, if you combine the adjudication with the administration, and we do not want to do that.
It has been my position from the time the proviso was at the committee--at the Rules Committee--and it will be my position in the conference, that the Racial Justice Act should be prospective only in application.





