this is another amendment to try and kill the entire bill, a delaying tactic that I find really a little tiresome, when the bill includes the Title XIII the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children Act, Title V, the proposed three-time loser section covers sexual abuse, abusive sexual contact and assaults with intention to commit rape. Title III includes assaults against children. Title XII includes the Child Sexual Prevention Act. Title XVI has the omnibus violence against women provisions, which I trust Members are for. Still to be acted upon, we have amendments approved by the Committee on Rules covering child pornography, introduced by a Republican, the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Smith]. We have yet to come a stalking and domestic violence amendment introduced by the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Kennedy]. Mr. Chairman, we have a lot of good material in here to protect children and women. We want to keep it in here. We cannot add every untried idea that has ever been dreamed up but has never had a minute of hearings or this bill will be a little bit too cumbersome to fly. So I am hopeful that we can defeat this procedural amendment to strike, and go on with the consideration of this crime bill.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing amendments to a crime bill during House floor debate.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
Mr. Chairman, the amendment I am offering to the crime bill will establish a Police Corps program to provide college students with aid for education in return for serving 4 years with a State or local law enforcement agency. This amendment…
None of them that agreed to that, Republican or Democrat, have felt that it needed to be done?
But I have never deterred from my route since then. It is these people that go back and forth that make you nervous.
It has been my position from the time the proviso was at the committee--at the Rules Committee--and it will be my position in the conference, that the Racial Justice Act should be prospective only in application.





