The Conference Committee on S. 636 reported back to us a product that merges the Senate and the House-passed bills in a very careful, balanced fashion. Thus, the Senate's protections against interfering with the exercise of religious freedom at places of religious worship have been preserved. Those protections are the same as those enjoyed by persons obtaining or providing reproductive health services. The Conference Committee agreed to the lower penalties found in the Senate version of the legislation, which was also a matter of some importance to the Members of this body. Other House Members were concerned that the meaning of the words interfere with were not defined in the House bill. The Senate bill's definition of that term is contained in the conference report. The report also consolidates and clarifies the various rules of construction, without losing any of their meaning.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Conference Committee's report on S. 636 regarding religious freedom and reproductive health services.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
I applaud the apparent goal of the gentleman from New Jersey to insure that Federal prisoners do attain a high school education. We all agree on that. But I want to review the facts. Since 1981, all Federal prisoners who do not have a high…
I must rise in strong opposition to this amendment. The amendment, has two different parts--which, for some reason, seems to be obscured by the sponsors in describing the amendment. Now that the moment of truth has arrived it is essential…
But I have never deterred from my route since then. It is these people that go back and forth that make you nervous.
This motion makes the sixth time that the other side of the aisle has seen fit to try and derail through procedural tactics the toughest, most carefully structured crime bill to come out of the House in 20 years. The effort to stall…





