we have now reached the end of the day on the issue before us. The general debate time has allowed every possible argument to be aired by the proponents who seem to have no qualms whatsoever about taking a simplistic approach to a very complicated issue. Where the debate has veered off into what I consider an unacceptable and mean area is where the self-anointed arbiters of morality have attempted to paint legitimate, law-abiding gunowners as part of the dark force in America who aid and abet the proliferation of violence in our society. Some would have you believe that to vote against this ill-conceived, overbroad, and unbelievably vague piece of draftsmanship is to sanction the terrible scenes of carnage that we all witness on the late news before going to bed at night. This is a terrible falsehood and worthy of the description of the 'big lie'--that if repeated often enough, can cloud reason and clear-headed thinking. Well, it hasn't swayed my mind one bit or the many other Members in this body who know that the problem of violence has to do with the roots of crime, with the pervasiveness of drugs, with violent impulses and malice of heart that leads individuals with no moorings in civilized life to commit unspeakable acts. It is very easy for us sitting here in the Northeast corridor to forget about the rest of the continental United States and the citizens who live there.…
Jack Brooks: “we have now reached the end of the day on the issue before us. The general debate time has allowed every possible…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the debate on gun control and the portrayal of gun owners during a floor speech.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
Mr. Chairman, while I appreciate the gentleman's effort to provide a comprehensive solution to the problems of private security guards whose qualifications may be suspect, I have a number of concerns which lead me to oppose the amendment…
I must rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio. While this amendment is apparently well-intentioned--and I support the goal of the gentleman--his amendment's potential effect on domestic commerce could be…
this is the fourth attempt by the other side of the aisle to offer a motion to strike after the enacting clauses--all in an attempt to delay the progress of the crime bill. It takes about 25 minutes each time, 10 minutes for debate, 15…
I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon [Mr. Kopetski] which would strike the death penalty provisions of H.R. 4092 and substitute mandatory life imprisonment. I have the utmost respect for the…





