There is considerable bipartisan legislation in the Senate on this subject, and I hope it is one where we can get something serious accomplished in the months ahead.
Lindsey Graham
The Public Record
Lindsey Olin Graham is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from South Carolina since 2003. A member of the Republican Party, Graham has been a prominent figure in national politics, known for his work on issues such as national security, foreign policy, and judicial appointments. He has played a key role in various legislative efforts and has been an outspoken advocate for military support to Ukraine in recent years.
Senator Graham raised the issue of cybersecurity, and he has been an extraordinarily helpful and forward-leaning Member of the Senate on protecting our country from the dangers of cyberattacks.
I think history's calm and dispassionate judgment will reflect that the Attorney General actually brought the Department back from a place where it had been, sadly, politicized.
If the Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriage bans are unconstitutional, it violates the U.S. Constitution for a State to try to limit marriage between a man and a woman.
Under the doctrine of preemption, would the Federal law preempt States who are trying to legalize the substance?
Marijuana is still a criminal substance under Federal law, and it is still a crime not only to possess but to distribute under Federal law.
Do you think the NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program that we have in effect today is constitutional?
If Congress continues to implement sequestration, it will devastate the Department of Justice's ability to effectively defend this country.
Thank you very much, Ms. Lynch, and congratulations on being chosen by the President.
So, we have to realize, politically, that an Iraqi politician has a different calculation than an American political leader, here.
But, somebody's going to have to take Mosul back, right? And we want it to be Iraqis.
A line of defense for America is best achieved by having allies in the region.
If we don't replace sequestration, our capability to deal with the National security threats you've described is greatly diminished.
I am not advocating 100,000 American troops on the ground in Syria, but I am advocating that the longer this problem goes, the more likely we are going to get hit here.
It's time to put these guys on the run with a regional force that we complement.
At the end of the day, let's see what we do agree on. This is a generational struggle when it comes to radical Islam, Sunni, and Shi'a.
What I will not accept is the status quo, that it is okay to not go after these guys because it is not.
Let the negotiations go forward without sanctions, but when a deal is reached, would it be okay with both of you if Congress, under the 123 section of the Atomic Energy Act, had a chance to review it?
To the American people, we're going to have some boots on the ground if we want to get this right.
The hardest part of getting this war won, I believe, is just the patience--strategic patience that comes from investing in others.
I am advocating that America cannot sit on the sideline and let 300,000 Syrians get slaughtered because it is complicated.
I would like to help those young people, and in the process, not blow up the world.
How we find a peaceful resolution to the Iranian nuclear ambitions is the primary goal I share with you.





