To begin with, if the defendant was indigent, it would be totally uncollectable anyway. So it would be of no value to anybody to get it. I would imagine the plaintiffs would be willing to go along with, unless, unless it happened to be an insurance company that was behind it.
William Moorhead: “To begin with, if the defendant was indigent, it would be totally uncollectable anyway. So it would be of no value to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of collecting judgments from indigent defendants.
Share
More from William Moorhead
I say to the gentleman, ``Primarily because, whey you cut from 100 percent to 25 percent, you're gutting the very issue we're talking about.''
Possibility. I say to the gentleman, ``I think you're just defeating loser pays.''
But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught paying the other person's fees. But I can tell the gentleman that you can limit the amount of money you may have to pay…
I obviously do not have any choice one way or the other in the operation of the House, but this is a good measure. It is something that will do good for the country. I appreciate very much the gentleman from New Mexico's support for what…





