But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught paying the other person's fees. But I can tell the gentleman that you can limit the amount of money you may have to pay by prior to 10 days before trial making your final offer and you will not have to pay the fees that have accrued prior to that time. You many be able to strike under the present bill a large percent of what you might otherwise have had to pay. But I do think that if you go down from there and have only 25 percent of what would accrue from that time forward, you do not have very much left out of your loser pays.
William Moorhead: “But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to legal fees during a floor debate.
Share
More from William Moorhead
This is an unconscionable tax on innovation, a tax on American inventors for seeking to share with the American public the results of their creativity. This amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia proposes to take another $34…
I understand that, and I did comment on that in my comments, that you come to another argument when you go into that. You lead to further litigation and dispute as to whether the offer has been reasonable or unreasonable, many other things…
Activation may include getting the different parts of the operating system through the RAM. Because the entire operating system may not entirely fit into the RAM, activation may proceed through a series of steps until the entire operating…
Possibility. I say to the gentleman, ``I think you're just defeating loser pays.''





