I have every confidence that Jeff Sessions will execute the office of Attorney General honestly, faithfully, and fully in the pursuit of justice.
Arlen Specter
The Public Record
Arlen Specter was a prominent American politician who served as a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania for 30 years, from 1981 to 2011. Originally a member of the Republican Party, he switched to the Democratic Party in 2009. During his tenure, Specter was known for his moderate positions and played a key role in various significant legislative efforts, including judicial nominations and health care reform. He was involved in high-profile hearings, including those related to the 9/11 attacks and the confirmation of Supreme Court justices.
Senator Specter cited just one. It was his vote against confirming Jeff Sessions as a Federal judge.
the reason we serve is to ensure that our children and our children's children inherit the same great country that we received from those who went before us.
the reason we serve is to ensure our children and our children's children inherit the same great country that we received from those who went before us.
We are trying to make sure that we have maximum impact in the places that could use the money the most.
I cannot applaud Rutland enough, because we had a similar hearing a few years ago when Senator Arlen Specter and I were here, and that shaped a number of federal programs for the better because of what we heard from you.
Congressional legislation 'doesn't amount to anything if the president can say, 'My constitutional authority supersedes the statute.'
The Congress has the authority to handle administrative matters legislatively.
Not only does the Court affect the daily lives of all Americans, it has a tremendous impact upon the separation of powers.
The Court is very ideologically driven at the moment, and I think the public needs to understand that.
I think Senator Sessions has it right when he says they consider it their domain. Well, it is not.
I believe that it is vital that the public really understands what the Supreme Court does.
The authority of the Congress under the Commerce Clause was unchallenged for 60 years and then in Lopez and Morrison cut back.
I believe that if the Court were televised, there would be an understanding and an accountability.
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
I do not think we are being too assertive if we say to the Supreme Court, 'Televise.'
The Congress, under separation of powers, has the authority to find the facts, and then there is need only for a rational relationship between what Congress finds factually and the legislation which Congress enacts.
I think the public's right to know and the benefit of an informed citizenry vastly outweigh what you quote Justice Kennedy as talking about collegial dynamics.
last year I introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, H.R. 1504. As I explained in my accompanying floor statement, my objective was to restore the pleading standard that had governed federal civil practice if not since the…





