This is an unconscionable tax on innovation, a tax on American inventors for seeking to share with the American public the results of their creativity. This amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia proposes to take another $34 million from America's patent applicants to fund the Legal Services Corporation. If my colleagues believe in the Legal Services Corporation, take it from the taxpayers and not one specific group of people who pay entirely for the support of their own agency. This tax on innovation, this theft from American inventors, must be rejected.
William Moorhead: “This is an unconscionable tax on innovation, a tax on American inventors for seeking to share with the American public…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding sources for the Legal Services Corporation and its impact on patent applicants.
Share
More from William Moorhead
I obviously do not have any choice one way or the other in the operation of the House, but this is a good measure. It is something that will do good for the country. I appreciate very much the gentleman from New Mexico's support for what…
Latitude in every single case where they have not found that it will work an injustice. We have in our legislation that we have, we have provisions in those extreme cases where the judge does have a latitude.
Senior U.S. District Judge Milton Shadur of the northern district of Illinois said he generally would welcome the restoration of the old rule. "The most recent changes watered it down," he says, "by offering an out for lawyers who get…
But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught paying the other person's fees. But I can tell the gentleman that you can limit the amount of money you may have to pay…





