I understand that, and I did comment on that in my comments, that you come to another argument when you go into that. You lead to further litigation and dispute as to whether the offer has been reasonable or unreasonable, many other things that could be involved there, and we are going to have an irregularity between one judge and another as to what you get out of the law as we intend it to be.
Discussing potential legal disputes and inconsistencies in judicial interpretation.
Share
More from William Moorhead
I rise to oppose the Berman amendment to the McHale amendment and to oppose the McHale amendment. Mr. Chairman, the Berman amendment really destroys all the loser-pays provisions, and particularly the Goodlatte amendment, which we have…
I share the concern of the gentleman from Maryland. It is our intention that rule XI(c) be applied equally to all litigants, and that the Federal judges exercise no special restraint when dealing with the Federal Government.
1995 marks the 80th anniversary of the Armenian genocide. Every year in Congress April 24 is remembered on the floor of the House, and I have participated in this occasion for a large number of years, a tribute to the Armenian martyrs who…
This is an unconscionable tax on innovation, a tax on American inventors for seeking to share with the American public the results of their creativity. This amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia proposes to take another $34…
Other voices in this conversation
