I understand that, and I did comment on that in my comments, that you come to another argument when you go into that. You lead to further litigation and dispute as to whether the offer has been reasonable or unreasonable, many other things that could be involved there, and we are going to have an irregularity between one judge and another as to what you get out of the law as we intend it to be.
Discussing potential legal disputes and inconsistencies in judicial interpretation.
Share
More from William Moorhead
Latitude in every single case where they have not found that it will work an injustice. We have in our legislation that we have, we have provisions in those extreme cases where the judge does have a latitude.
I say to the gentleman, ``Primarily because, whey you cut from 100 percent to 25 percent, you're gutting the very issue we're talking about.''
Activation may include getting the different parts of the operating system through the RAM. Because the entire operating system may not entirely fit into the RAM, activation may proceed through a series of steps until the entire operating…
But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught paying the other person's fees. But I can tell the gentleman that you can limit the amount of money you may have to pay…
Other voices in this conversation
