Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 28, 1995
I rise in support of H.R. 1170, which provides for a three-judge court review of statewide referenda. H.R. 1170 provides that requests for injunctions in cases challenging the constitutionality of measures passed by State referendum must be heard by a three-judge panel. Like other Federal legislation containing a provision providing for a hearing by a three-judge court, H.R. 1170 is designed to protect voters in the exercise of their vote and to further protect the results of that vote. It requires that legislation voted upon and approved directly by the populace of a State be afforded the protection of a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2284 when an application for an injunction is brought in Federal court to arrest the enforcement of the referendum on the premise that the referendum is unconstitutional. In effect, where the entire populace of a State democratically exercises a direct vote on an issue, one Federal judge will not be able to issue an injunction preventing the enforcement of the will of the people of that State.
Said by
William Moorhead
Democratic · Pennsylvania

Editor's note · Context

Supporting H.R. 1170, which mandates three-judge court reviews for statewide referenda challenges.

Share

More from William Moorhead

Mar 6, 1995

I rise to oppose the Berman amendment to the McHale amendment and to oppose the McHale amendment. Mr. Chairman, the Berman amendment really destroys all the loser-pays provisions, and particularly the Goodlatte amendment, which we have…

govinfo.gov
Mar 7, 1995

I understand that, and I did comment on that in my comments, that you come to another argument when you go into that. You lead to further litigation and dispute as to whether the offer has been reasonable or unreasonable, many other things…

govinfo.gov
Mar 6, 1995

But it still says that those class of expenses if they would be manifestly unjust, there is an exception.

govinfo.gov
Mar 6, 1995

I share the concern of the gentleman from Maryland. It is our intention that rule XI(c) be applied equally to all litigants, and that the Federal judges exercise no special restraint when dealing with the Federal Government.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation