I rise to oppose the Berman amendment to the McHale amendment and to oppose the McHale amendment. Mr. Chairman, the Berman amendment really destroys all the loser-pays provisions, and particularly the Goodlatte amendment, which we have been working on for several days, in fact for a couple of weeks. The original amendment, Mr. McHale's amendment, is much broader than the bill itself, and we have not had an opportunity in committee or in hearings or anything else to go over this broad an amendment. I think that it destroys the possibility of the bill passing. I think it weakens the bill. In that respect I would, as chairman of the subcommittee, be willing to have hearings on the subject later on.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Berman and McHale amendments during a committee discussion.
Share
More from William Moorhead
Latitude in every single case where they have not found that it will work an injustice. We have in our legislation that we have, we have provisions in those extreme cases where the judge does have a latitude.
I rise in support of H.R. 2297, which restates without substantive change, laws related to transportation and makes other technical improvements in the United States Code. The bill was prepared for the House Judiciary Committee by the…
First if he is as broke and poor as you say, of course, I would not want a judgment against him because it would not be worth very much. But there is a provision in the law that we are promoting that says if it would be manifestly unjust…
Possibility. I say to the gentleman, ``I think you're just defeating loser pays.''





