There will be more investigations. There will be more congressional resolutions passed.

If the White House is going to object, they have a constitutional basis to do so. It needs to be litigated as it has been throughout the course of the history of this country, not by the Senate impeachment or not by the chief justice. It's…

The larger point is when I say they gave them a bum case, it was not because they didn't interview a bunch of witnesses and didn't have documents, it's because that the charges that were laid out in the impeachment are not -- are not -- as…

Again, if you are the one being accused, remember, this was started by House Democrats, they have the burden of proof, they have not met the burden of proof.

I suspect that they don't want any wild cards, of course. I mean, that's -- any White House would not want somebody who they don't their testimony to be testifying at a Senate trial.

If there's any part of this, there's a grievance. It's the Democratic Party, not the Republican Party.

That's a foundational problem that goes way beyond impeachment.

I think it is the right thing to do.

This is a tragic day. ... But the people who voted to impeach him are going to be judged, too.

I think that's why the judgment on this impeachment is going to be quicker and more severe, because unlike every other impeachment, there was an election shortly after the impeachment where those who impeached as well as the impeach -- the…

you heard Chuck Schumer, you know, we want witnesses. But, you know, only witnesses that we think are relevant.

Yes. Look, there's one -- one of the two article really does bothers me on the weaponization font and that is that the second one on obstruction. Because every single president I'm familiar with has exerted -- has basically, you know…