It was a legal request.

This is why he's not at 60 percent popularity.

I agree with 90 percent of what he does, 20 percent of what he says and this is one of the 80 percent that I don't agree with.

The only thing that's being talked about in Congress right now by any Democrats for over a year has been impeaching the President and that's the big problem the Democrats are going to have.

I look at my state of Pennsylvania and clearly the suburbs there are turning and they're not turning in our direction and Donald Trump is not a help in that regard, particularly amongst suburban women.

Did you -- you guys need to read the transcript, because I'm listening to this throughout the whole show.

I would agree with you that is bad judgment. I agree that the President should not have said that.

You may be surprised to hear that I disagree with this.

It doesn't seem to me like he would be covered by executive privilege, but that doesn't mean that the president can't assert it and have it litigated.

In sum, I think it was a very bad day for the House Democrats. It just looked desperate. It looked pathetic, frankly.

I guarantee you neither candidate for president by the time November of 2020 rolls around will have a net positive favorability.

If I was Trump, I'd be trumpeting this. I think it's a good sign for them.

This is one of the things I scratch my head and wonder why the president doesn't see the obvious -- not just conflict of interest but how it could be used by his political opponents to undermine some of the good things that he's trying to…

I hope that's not true and if it is true, I hope they put on end to it very quickly.

I think the president paid a price. I mean, that's a story to be told, too.

I think that's just who he is and it's inappropriate. He shouldn't do it.

I think the president is responding to the Chinese advice that said they wanted in this trade dispute, they don't want escalation, they want to calm the resolution.

I think the president has done I believe a very good job in getting China to the table here.

I think the first two points are legitimate points. I mean, the fact is that the president should not be doing this. He shouldn't -- it would be a violation of the law as far as I understand it.

I need your back. If I'm going to be able to stand up to the Chinese and fight the Chinese and win -- and look, as much as the economy is being hurt here in the U.S., it pails in comparison what is happening to China.

this is a president that will try something different. You may say it's irrational. You may say it hurts our country, all those things may be true, but it's something different that may end up with a different result than we've been…

the president has been chosen because he stepped forward, not because he's the messiah, because he actually chose to do this, to wage a fight that presidents in the past have passed upon and Democrats and Republicans have been urging…

the long-term goal of dealing with China and they are undermining our economy is more important than 3 percent, I mean 2 percent versus 3 percent growth.

I think it's really interesting that she said we'll work in a bipartisan way to do what we want, which is to pass our agenda.

I have in principle no problem at all with red flags laws as long as there is due process that people can't arbitrarily get denied the opportunity to purchase a gun.