Conor Lamb says, no, we haven't, here I am, you can vote for me, it's safe.

I keep coming back to the fact, 25,000 more registered Democrats, you can say during county it's a Republican area, yes it votes Republican in national elections.

Conor Lamb was the absolutely right candidate and he didn't get through a primary.

there are going to be a lot more Conor Lambs on the ballot because Democrats are energized, more candidate are running and better candidates are running.

If you run a traditional Democrat in that district, a Bernie Sanders/Hillary Clinton/Barack Obama Democrat, it's not close.

It's always a bad election for the party in power and we have a President that's a very polarizing President.

I think it is clear, I would rather in Conor Lamb's shoes right now than Rick Saccone.

I'm not suggesting that it shouldn't be a huge deal, and I'm not suggesting... that somehow there's a moral equivalency between what Donald Trump did 10 years before he was President and what Bill Clinton did in the White House with an…

I would say, yes, you're going to get more conflict, more rowdiness out of the Trump group, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're bad.

What the White House is doing is, I think, purely political.

Most Republicans have gone along, but I think most are uncomfortable with it.

If President Obama -- if it had been revealed that he had paid off somebody for $130,000 before becoming President in the final days of a campaign, wouldn't that be a huge deal on the right?