On the recordMay 11, 2006
Let me understand, if I am correct, the Senator from Illinois is objecting to moving forward with a bill that has never been considered, that has support, I assume, from both sides of the aisle, that is important from the standpoint of insuring more people; and the reason he does not want to let that go forward is to bring up two issues that have repeatedly been brought up in the Senate, including this session of Congress, and he has been defeated on, and a third issue which the majority leader has already said he would give time for. That is his reason for objecting to this unanimous consent?
Source
govinfo.gov




