Rick Santorum

I think overall I think this is the bill that's most likely to be the bill that replaces Obamacare whether it's now, in a couple months or maybe in six months.

These ideas used to be bipartisan and now maybe we just need a little bit more time to drill that message through.

I think what's been determined particularly about the hearing today, which I testified at the finance committee. I think there is broad support among Republicans for this approach that does two things.

The President doesn't want to move on to tax reform. He wants to get a bill done.

I don't think any senator right now having watching Donald Trump for six or seven months expects Donald Trump to have their back if they cross him.

I mean there would be pounded away how bad Donald Trump is doing, how he can't leave the country. And nobody is talking about any of that.

I think it's very, very important that this administration realize that they've got some damage done here, and if there is anything else to be disclosed, it's the time.

If the president goes to the Middle East and he does what Professor Dershowitz talked about, you know, put some tangible agreements on the table...

America voted for this problem.

If you think what's happened over the past 10 days is really been good for the country, do you that think this type of indiscriminant leaking of classified information... is good for the country, then you probably are not in my mind a…

I don't really take that seriously what Russians say to each other and what's leaked from those conversations.

I think they've dramatically improved this bill.

I think the message to your point why are they leaking this out now? Why are there recriminations now? I think it's a very clear signal to the Freedom Caucus that we got your back in the Senate.

I think we need to get our manufacturing back here. I think the president is the right guy at the right time for America and I think this is a distraction that hurts his ability to get that done.

This is the most important speech because this shows I'm a serious person in the White House, I have serious proposals, I have ideas, here's where I want to take America.

If Chuck Schumer decides and if the Democrats decide, OK, we're going to stand and we're going to try to fight, we're going to filibuster this, then what they've done is force the Republicans into the nuclear option.

This was a great chess move. They made a great entry chess move here. They have set themselves up not only to get a great justice in Neil Gorsuch.

I think this is a terrific pick and he is very clear, he wrote a treat us on it. That's why a lot of the pro-life people are very happy.

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm not play in this game if you guys want to play. President can still defend himself, he doesn't need Rick Santorum to defend him.

And the White House is the last place for on the job training.

Senator Santorum makes the point that he is sympathetic to child savings accounts because he sees them as part of an ownership society.

This is a direct assault on us and our family to hand over to the state the ability to make medical determinations and see what is in the best interests of the child and not look at the wonderful gift that every child is.

This is a direct assault on us and our family. To hand over to the state the ability to make medical determinations and see what is in the best interest of the child and not look at the wonderful gift that every child is.

This is a direct assault on us and our family to hand over to the state the ability to make medical determinations and see what is in the best interest of the child and not look at the wonderful gift that every child is.

The problem is there is a provision in this international law, which we would be adopting if the Senate ratifies this, which puts the state in the position of determining what is in the best interest of a disabled child.