This was something that was made, deliberately made, to look like the Census.
Matt Cartwright
The Public Record
Matt Alton Cartwright is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district since January 3, 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Cartwright has focused on issues such as healthcare, job creation, and infrastructure during his time in office. He has been an advocate for policies aimed at improving the lives of working families in his district and has worked on various initiatives to support local businesses and economic development.
I would like unanimous consent to enter this misleading survey into the record.
Look, protecting the safety and the health of the American public I see as one of our highest duties. Don't you?
I wish to associate myself with each and every one of your remarks, Mr. Kennedy.
The coal industry's risky self-insurance practices have endangered those benefits, and the mismanagement of funds and the lack of oversight by the Department of Labor have made a bad situation worse.
What is your answer about why that appeal was never adjudicated between 2015 and when they filed for bankruptcy in 2019?
What are the consequences of that Murray bankruptcy for the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund?
I think we can all agree there hasn't been a war on coal going on in 2018 and 2019.
I will be introducing the Black Lung Benefit Improvement Act to ensure that miners have access to unbiased medical evidence, ample representation, and up to date benefit payments.
The government of Puerto Rico and the Oversight Board oppose amendments to PROMESA.
I urge my Republican colleagues to jump on board, particularly those who are engaging in the 'whataboutism' that we have heard today.
And how many of you would agree that these people should be prohibited from intimidating or coercing an individual to alter or censor, or retaliating against an individual for failing to alter or censor, scientific or technical findings?
How many people think that these people should be prohibited from suppressing, altering, interfering with, or otherwise impeding the timely release and communication of scientific or technical findings?
How many of you would agree that these people that I just described, listed, should be prohibited from engaging in dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, coercive manipulation, or other scientific or research misconduct?
I want to talk about Federal employees or Federal contractors engaged in scientific research analyzing the results of scientific research, communicating the results of scientific research, or making policy decisions based on the results of…
If you believe in scientific integrity, you should be a co-sponsor of the Scientific Integrity Act sponsored by Mr. Tonko for these reasons and the other ones expressed today.
But knowing the vital part that private contractors are going to be playing, are you satisfied that NASA has enough personnel...
The language would give you carte blanche authority to move funds among NASA's accounts from this year forward if you determine that transfers are necessary in support of the establishment of the U.S. strategic presence on the Moon
I mean, you go to buy a car and there is a car salesman standing there, and what do you ask him? You ask him how much is the car.
We increased NASA's funding by $815 million, which fully funded the lunar landing program and robustly funded scientific discovery and STEM education.
What NOAA did in response to political pressure hurts faith in science as an institution and I fear things like that will damage the appeal of science as a career to the next generation.
The pressure on our scientific agencies to be complicit in this farce and reenforce false and dangerous information is what really disturbs me.
When the administration's budget slashes funding in key research areas... that sends the wrong message about how we value science here in the United States.





