And how many of you would agree that these people should be prohibited from intimidating or coercing an individual to alter or censor, or retaliating against an individual for failing to alter or censor, scientific or technical findings?
Cartwright questions the need to protect researchers from coercion.
Share
More from Matt Cartwright
I thank the gentleman for the time, and I rise in support of this bill. The Commerce-Justice-Science division of this bill preserves solid funding for an array of important public investments. For example, the Manufacturing Extension…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Montana will be postponed. Amendment No. 92 Offered by Mr. Rosendale The Acting CHAIR. It is…
I claim the time in opposition to this amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania is recognized for 5 minutes.
Other voices in this conversation
