We have the finest fighting force the world has ever known.

I am firmly committed to maintaining Taiwan's self-defense capability, consistent with our one-China policy.

If confirmed as Secretary of Defense, I pledge to make needed change in the Pentagon, but also to seek support from Congress because I know that in the end, Congress holds the power of the purse.

I think energy security is an important part of national security.

If confirmed, I will direct the Department to carefully review and evaluate the Commission's recommendations to ensure they sustain the All-Volunteer Force, provide the benefits to our servicemembers that are required, and achieve fiscal…

An important purpose of our posture in the Asia Pacific region is to deter aggression by any power, including Russia.

Our strength in Europe is our alliance with NATO and the political solidarity that that represents.

I think that we have two immediate substantial dangers in the Middle East. One is ISIL, and one is Iran.

India is, in my view, destined to be a strategic partner of the United States.

I think that is an important thing to do.

If confirmed as Secretary of Defense, my responsibilities would be to protect America and its friends and allies in a turbulent and dangerous world.

The U.S. approach to the Arctic should support our core objectives to ensure security and promote defense cooperation.

If confirmed, I would, in close consultation with our senior military leaders, provide the President with my best strategic advice as to how to most effectively counter the ISIL threat.

An important purpose of United States force posture in the Pacific Region is to deter aggression on the Korean Peninsula.

The administration can assist Taiwan by evaluating the projected threat from China, consulting closely with Congress, and providing recommendations on defense articles and services appropriate for Taiwan.

I strongly incline toward opening them all to women, but I am also respectful of the circumstances and of professional military judgment in this regard.

In response to Russia's violation of the INF Treaty, the United States should consider a comprehensive strategy of diplomatic, economic, and military responses.

I think deterrence requires that a potential aggressor know that you have the capability to respond.

I reject the notion that Russia should be afforded a 'sphere of influence.'

What is particularly tragic is that sequestration is not a result of an economic emergency or a recession.

We want them to continue to be isolated as a military and limited in terms of the kinds of equipment and materials they are able to get.

You may all be surprised to know that nuclear weapons don't actually cost that much.

It is important that people in the region, both our friends and potential opponents, understand that we have the capacity and will to do that.

I urge Congress to develop a comprehensive and balanced deficit reduction package that the House and Senate can pass, and that the President can sign.

Sequester is irrational, mindless, and damaging.