I just have a hard time declaring suddenly a new definition of free trade agreement that does not have market access.
James Lankford
The Public Record
James Paul Lankford is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Oklahoma since January 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Lankford has focused on issues such as healthcare, government spending, and religious freedom during his time in office. He previously served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2011 to 2015, representing Oklahoma's 5th congressional district.
I think you have heard bipartisan--we want to continue to stay engaged through the administration, to be able to work on free trade agreements.
We have had a new designation show up recently on documents that get brought over to our staff.
I think you need to have that in place because as Liza has indicated--and I have many examples that I can share with the Committee--the classification system has been repeatedly misused to conceal those very kinds of things.
I recently introduced the Quad Critical Minerals Partnership Act with Senators Warner, Cornyn, and King in order to make those investments alongside Japan, India, and Australia.
What are we doing actively right now to expand our input and trade relationships with those in the Abraham Accords?
I just have a hard time declaring suddenly a new definition of free trade agreement that does not have market access.
I think you have heard bipartisan--we want to continue to stay engaged through the administration, to be able to work on free trade agreements.
I think when everybody writes 'free trade agreement,' there is an assumption of what that means.
I agree somewhat with Senator Blumenthal, the description of the problem is much easier than the actual availability of the answer.
We currently are one of the worst countries in the world for research and development (R&D), based on our current tax policy.
It cannot work worse than the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) model that we currently have.
Veterans deserve better, and we should not be reliant on a supply chain that is that tenuous.
If we had international competition it helps to keep our prices down, but it also would help to keep the supply up as well.
I get that, but there are probably not kids' names in the report; but thank you.
I do not know why there would be a good reason you could not share with this committee.
There are 85,000 children that HHS lost immediate contact with once they were placed in sponsorship.
We would be glad to work with the administration. You will find bipartisan support to be able to deal with this.





