Well, it's not how I take it. It is how somebody back home or somebody in another state might take it. We have got death threats coming into our offices, coming into other offices of member of Congress.

Well, it's not how I take it. It's how somebody back home or somebody in another state might take it. We've got death threats coming into our offices, coming into other offices of members of Congress.

My wife and kids are at home. They're organizing protests in front of my house. We're getting death threats on the telephone.

They're engaged in rhetoric that goes way beyond the pale of what's responsible. They're inciting behavior and I think they should be held responsible for that.

They're engaged in rhetoric that goes well beyond the pale of what's responsible. They're inciting behavior. And I think they should be held responsible for that.

I really do think that the objective, obviously, through the voucher program, is to allow families, allow kids to grow up in neighborhoods that create a supportive environment.

we found a lot of investors going in and purchasing single family homes in what were moderate priced neighborhoods.

The challenge we face is that those runaways can change dramatically from street to street in certain neighborhoods.

we created this kind of artificial mixed-income neighborhood through the HOPE VI project.

we haven't seen it play out that way in Cincinnati.

What we are doing with the plan that is being put forward today, I am concerned, is you are going to eliminate choice by requiring government bureaucrats to define what are suitable financial products.