This is really an issue of fairness--an issue of fairness for property owners. You've got the Federal Government coming onto your property, telling you that you have to purchase flood insurance because you're now designated within the map. When you find FEMA to be wrong, that payment shouldn't be incurred by you, the property owner, but it should be reimbursed by FEMA. It's just that simple. This is a taking. And the Federal Government shouldn't be in the business of taking property, which is what they're doing in this case, in the form of the expenses that are incurred by the homeowners. This has impacted thousands of Americans. And it's wrong that the Federal Government is making them pay the price to challenge the Federal Government.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses fairness in flood insurance requirements imposed by the Federal Government on property owners.
Share
More from Steve Driehaus
Yes, those amendments were offered, but as you know, not a dime of TARP money is being used in this bill, so it's not appropriate for SIGTARP to have the oversight. In fact, Mr. Thorson, who will have the oversight, has incredible…
The political framework of the Republicans is that they want to call everything a bailout. And when it's not a bailout, they want to act like it is. They want to call this TARP even when it's not. So this doesn't fit into the definition…
I appreciate the gentleman from New York for yielding. This is a critical issue, and I share his concern with regard to stripping of the authorization for the competitive engine. Just this past year, the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform…
I think tomorrow we're going to hear from the President, and the President is going to challenge us. Because while we know we've seen a 60 percent increase in the stock market over the last year, we also know that we're not to the point…





