So to the extent, then, that we have a problem with the nature of the information to the public, you would say to me that it goes back to the OCC?

It is not costless to them. Neither was it costless to the individuals who may have been falsely brought into a process.

I understand there is a whole team, but let me maybe hone in on my question.

the consent orders do not end dual track. They perpetuate it

When they approached us, they asked us if we were interested in doing the work...

How do you--how are you going to make that judgment?

This is unacceptable to hear that they say it may not be possible, it is up to you.

They deserve, clearly, relief.

Is the judgment going to be, well, I read their narrative and there is nothing to back up their narrative, so, therefore, sorry, we do not think you qualify?

We are going to put everybody in the room and figure it out.

Having listened to Ms. Williams describe that the overwhelming universe that responded, responded in a narrative form about what they thought was happening to them, I thought very much that they provided all of the substantial information…