What steps does Russia need to take to bring itself back into compliance with the treaty?

It appears that the Russians have consistently said that they value the INF Treaty and would like to preserve it.

If New START disappears and the limitations on Russian forces lapse, what would be the implications for U.S. national security and that of our allies?

the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing on Russia's role in Syria and the broader Middle East that had been scheduled for last week has been postponed; therefore, I rise today to raise awareness on the danger and urgency of the…

Obviously, Salisbury--that attack directly contravenes the Chemical Weapons Convention which is a fundamental pillar of international attempts to limit the use of weapons of mass destruction.

So assuming that that goes unabated, then there should be more consequences. Is that a fair statement?

The American people, the elected officials in this body, and members of the President's own administration hear more from Russian officials about alleged agreements that the President is making about critical national security issues.

Well, the question is, if Russia continues to meet its obligation and is in compliance, you cannot tell me whether we can meet our deterrence requirements under the New START treaty?

Did verbal agreements get entered into, and if so, what are they?

I find it incredible that you cannot tell this committee at this point in time what the possibilities would mean.

It was written in a way to be comprehensive enough to deal with all of Russia's malign activities.

Do you agree that the New START treaty meets the standard put forward in the Nuclear Posture Review for arms control treaties and that it fosters transparency, understanding predictability in relations with Russia, thereby reducing the…