Bonnie Watson Coleman

The educational offering that we saw at Homestead was really very disturbing.

Is there any legal prohibition stopping a facility of this nature becoming a permanent facility, getting a license?

So are we doing intensive research on these disparities on the why, what to do about it, and things of that nature?

I found very offensive. And what it suggested was that parents are making a choice to be separated from their children.

I would like to just--I asked the question before, one about autism and what is happening, particularly as it relates to minorities and research.

Would it make more sense to have Federal licensing requirements that were uniform across the Nation?

I just think that we are in the wrong--we are moving in the wrong direction here.

Thank you. And I apologize for not being able to hear all of your testimony. I was in another hearing, but what I have heard and the answers to the questions have been very intriguing.

Is that a yes or a no?

I do think, however, it is important that Members of Congress who have identification can come to these facilities without first being--getting permission to come in so that we can actually see what really happens on a day-to-day basis.

The understanding that I have been given is that the process that you are engaging in is a closed process.

We are concerned about what happens with----

What is the problem with there being a more open process now as----

Thank you for your extension of time. Thank you very much for your----

we want to be safe and secure, but we also want to recognize that our privacy is our privacy, and we have guarantees under the Constitution

I said, that really doesn't necessarily prove that, as far as I am concerned.

I know you use this platform for terrorism. Do you use that platform at all for, sort-of, hate groups?

It's become abundantly clear that, as currently constituted, your leadership team is unable to adequately address the valid concerns of the civil rights community.

I think that probably covers the President of the United States of America, unfortunately.

We were alarmed to see your platform being abused to promote bigotry, and especially disappointed that it has taken media exposure and Congressional oversight to give a degree of transparency into your practices.

I have a serious problem with that.

You, Mr. Zuckerberg, should step down as chairman of the board as long as you serve as the chief executive officer.

Are there trigger words that come out of some of this speech that you think should be protected that needs to be taken down because it incites?

Sheryl Sandberg should step down from the board of directors as long as she serves as chief operating officer.

So, in my briefing, dog whistling has been mentioned as a certain kind of political messaging strategy that employs coded language to send a message to certain groups that flies under the radar.