I don’t know why you’re holding a bill that’s ready for signature hostage over a bill that will never pass in this Congress. It makes no sense.

I’d like to think a $15 million membrane could withstand a pocket knife.

“A Hot Steaming Pile of DOGE Shit”

Seems unequal to me.

What freaking parallel universe did I just wake up in?

I never speak ill of members when they want to be professional and they want to engage in a productive way, but when you do some of the bullshit he’s done on social media, that’s why he gets these comments out here.

That would be a big win for us tomorrow.

But my guess is based on his past experience, it’s going to be another hot steaming pile of DOGE shit.

I think he’s an incompetent sycophant and not the right person to lead DNI and you’re undermining what the confirmed administrator should be doing.

If I'm ultimately asked by the administration to judge it on the basis of the 14 points that we know, then it will not be a good assessment.

I mean, he's putting 702 [reauthorization] almost out of reach.

I ended up consulting with the members who were in cycle, and a lot of my votes during voterama were instructed by the majority of their preferences.

By the time the confirmation vote occurs, that payout pot for punks needs to be put away.

We need Republicans to do well in November, but the stupid stuff is killing our chances!

Jay Clayton is an OUTSTANDING choice by President Trump to serve as Director of National Intelligence.

I’m hearing a $300bn number and that’s concerning to me, so I just need the details.

A lot of members probably underestimate just how much any one member can have a tremendous amount of leverage — if they want to exert it.

Minimally, there has to be maximum transparency.

I’ve said repeatedly Obama made a mistake when he didn’t do the work to have it rise to the level of a treaty, and I believe that we should here.

If it’s a secret deal then how can I take it seriously?

They better not have said for one minute that the people who beat up police officers, like these right down here, were righteous people.

Had either version of the SAVE Act been adopted, the underlying bill would also have been at risk of losing privilege.

The gain will not offset the pain in key races, and urging Republicans to avoid further 'unforced errors' heading into November.

Instead, we added weight to that albatross by having 41 members vote to protect the program.

I did not understand why a supermajority of Republicans opposed my amendment, which I said was offered at the request of members in competitive races.