We know that generative AI models need to be fed large datasets to learn how to generate images based on user prompts.
Thom Tillis
The Public Record
Thom Tillis is an American politician and businessman currently serving as the junior United States senator from North Carolina, a position he has held since January 6, 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Tillis has focused on issues such as tax reform, healthcare, and national security during his tenure in the Senate. He previously served as the Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives from 2011 to 2012, where he played a significant role in shaping state legislation.
If you are outside of the work group process and you are just taking shots at it, you may find yourself on the table, from my perspective.
We must not only consider how our current IP laws apply to the field of generative AI, but also what changes, if any, may be necessary to incentivize future AI innovators and creators.
We know that generative AI models need to be fed large datasets to learn how to generate images based on user prompts.
I think this Committee has demonstrated that we are very thoughtful, and we are very diligent.
I think there is a natural cultural bias for rewarding the human beings who are truly the creators and the lifeblood of our creative community.
Strong, reliable, predictable IP rights are paramount to incentivizing U.S. innovation and creativity.
I hope people understand that we are very thorough and we are very persistent in our approach, and we are inclusive.
to me, trying to figure out what may or may not be in the language model is a lot like taking roll in a dark classroom.
We must not only consider how our current IP laws apply to the field of generative AI, but also what changes, if any, may be necessary to incentivize future AI innovators and creators.
I was actually inspired by one of the opening statements, so I went out and generated a cat driving a 1960 Corvette with a surfboard in it.
I was actually inspired by one of the opening statements, so I went out and generated a cat driving a 1960 Corvette with a surfboard in it.
Strong, reliable, predictable IP rights are paramount to incentivizing U.S. innovation and creativity.
If you are outside of the work group process and you are just taking shots at it, you may find yourself on the table, from my perspective.
I think there is a natural cultural bias for rewarding the human beings who are truly the creators and the lifeblood of our creative community.
to me, trying to figure out what may or may not be in the language model is a lot like taking roll in a dark classroom.
I think this Committee has demonstrated that we are very thoughtful, and we are very diligent.
Does anyone here disagree that a work that is derived even from, let's say, licensed content, that the consumer should know that this was created by a machine versus an original creative work by human beings?
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I was actually inspired by one of the opening statements, so I went out and generated a cat driving a 1960 Corvette with a surfboard in it.
I don't see a day 100 hundred years from now where those rooms are going to be named after great LLMs.
By the way, that looked much more like Pacific Coast Highway than South Beach.
I think that anyone that is watching this needs to understand that this isn't unique to Stability AI.





