I hope that you will publicly or privately share with us when those epidemiologists come back after they have looked at the genomic connection.

I have a concern regarding the subject of the 2005 BRAC, specifically, the current policy on the disposal of property.

It's of such strategic importance to us, not only for the Japanese-U.S. relationship, because now we'll have Japanese units training with our units in Guam, but also for the strategic necessity of the United States.

I appreciate the answer. Were this a weapons platform, I would probably walk away and say, interagency, they're still trying to figure how much stuff they're going to put on it.

What do you intend to do with the land that was purchased in Washington County?

Mr. Arny, would the Department still consider the EDC program a sensible way to dispose of BRAC property?

I think everybody in this room knows that in 90 days, this is not going to be settled because we don't even have the EIS done taking into account the noise of the F-35.

Mr. Arny, Mr. Calcara, and Ms. Ferguson, do any of the clean ups of DOD sites on the Superfund list require additional funding in fiscal year 2010 in addition to that being sought in the President's budget to remain on schedule to achieve…

Secretary Penn, how are the Marine Corps' training needs being evaluated and included in the EIS process supporting the move to Guam?

There's currently litigation on the move to Eglin?

If it isn't broke, don't fix it.

Does it make economic sense over the life cycle of the barracks?