Mark Meadows

If Democrats are serious, if they're serious about solving the border crisis, they must address, as I said before, the Flores settlement agreement, asylum loopholes, and the other laws and court decisions that incentivize aliens to make…

Abolish ICE. Abolish DHS, the entire Department. Walls are immoral, the Speaker of the House said, even though there's a wall in her state.

The comments from Democrats in Congress I think only serve to demean the public service of our brave Border Patrol employees and frankly--and this is important--to spark unnecessary outrage.

During the Presidency of Barack Obama, we didn't see outrage from the Democrats then.

I think the creation of a formal industry body to provide regular feedback about the FedRAMP process...

So you're playing a valuable part of making sure that not only your expertise gets folded into the bill that Chairman Connolly and I are working on but, more importantly, that your concerns get addressed.

Thank all of you for your testimony. Obviously, it's a second panel on really establishing the foundation for legislation to move forward.

If you will let this committee know the three major obstacles for creating delays for implementation, how we can either help that administratively or help that legislatively.

The Federal Government that spends over a hundred billion dollars a year on IT is so lagging behind the private sector.

I just want to highlight your leadership in this area and truly how you've worked, not only in a bipartisan way...

I hope those are all needed improvements we can agree on, and that includes the Trump administration.

Would something like that on FedRAMP be helpful to the process?

I think we're on the same page.

A single-payer solution isn't meeting the needs of our veterans who are serving this country with valor.

This hearing is just another attack on President Trump, and it is disappointing.

How can you undermine something that has already failed?

It is very clear to me, having talked with the President directly, it is very clear with me in talking with a number of people at the White House, that the FBI's location, whether it be in D.C. or anywhere else, they're agnostic.

I think it would be prudent for the FBI and maybe even Director Wray to come in and meet with the chairman and a few others that are very interested, I think would be the best word, in where we go with this.

I think most of this, from what I understand, Ms. Tyson, was more of an FBI decision than it was an executive branch decision at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Second, if you think that somehow the lack of giving documents to this committee is serving a greater purpose, I would assure you that it is not.

We just need the documents. This is not my first request for documents.

We want to make sure that their jobs are protected.

I think it's the wrong decision from a real estate perspective. I think it's a wrong decision in terms of efficiency.

The more documents that you give us in a transparent fashion, even if you think that it gives the wrong impression, it is better than the impression of us not getting the documents believing that there are bad things that you're keeping…

I don't agree with the decision to take the security clearances and move them to DOD.