The high probability, there would be a willfulness, and the willfulness would be determined in clause (b) by the probability that he should be aware. For example, when Vice President Gore went to the Buddhist monastery, should he have had a high probability that that was a fund-raising event and, given the nature of that fundraiser, was there a probability that they could have received, since the nuns and the monks at that monastery live on about a $40 stipend, would a reasonable person, would a reasonable court decide that there was a probability that there was illegal laundering and that there was a probability of foreign sources in that contribution?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of fundraising events and potential illegal contributions.
Share
More from Chip Pickering
Evidence shows that the Clinton-Gore reelection effort and the Democrat National Committee purposely sought foreign money in an effort to bypass our election laws. As far back as 1992, the Clinton-Gore campaign was raising money from…
The controversy here is over the allocation of whatever funds are available. The $26 million is greatly appreciated, but if it is done on a pro-rata basis, there is no distinction or difference between those who have taken steps consistent…
the letter from Secretary Shalala reads, ``The implementation of a pro rata proportionate distribution of payments for contract support costs will result in the reduction of funding to a significant number of tribes,'' we are not talking…
It could be done either way, as the litigation and the different challenges progress through the campaign FEC process and through the court process. But I do believe that we would find an answer to the gentleman's question as far as case…





