The letter from Secretary Shalala reads, ``The implementation of a pro rata proportionate distribution of payments for contract support costs will result in the reduction of funding to a significant number of tribes,'' we are not talking about just one tribe, ``a significant number of tribes and tribal organizations that have assumed,'' have taken the responsibility and the steps required of them, ``that have assumed the operation of IHS health programs.'' And then later in the letter it says, ``We therefore must object to the proposed proviso in S. 2237, since the tribes have not been consulted and since the abrupt and unforeseen funding reductions to many of the tribes currently receiving these payments would have a severely disruptive effect on health care delivery by these tribes.''
Chip Pickering: “The letter from Secretary Shalala reads, ``The implementation of a pro rata proportionate distribution of payments for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over funding reductions for tribes in relation to health care delivery.
Share
More from Chip Pickering
It could be done either way, as the litigation and the different challenges progress through the campaign FEC process and through the court process. But I do believe that we would find an answer to the gentleman's question as far as case…
It is with malice toward none and forgiveness of individual failures, but with a love of the law and our country, I will vote for the articles of impeachment
It is my understanding, based on our conversations, that the gentlewoman would encourage the city to do something similar to what they did when the World War II memorial was opened, and that is, to grant an emergency status to make sure…
Despite significant advances in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention, stroke remains the Nation's No. 3 killer and a leading cause of long-term disability. According to the American Heart Association, on the average every 45 seconds…





