The controversy here is over the allocation of whatever funds are available. The $26 million is greatly appreciated, but if it is done on a pro-rata basis, there is no distinction or difference between those who have taken steps consistent with the Self-Determination Act. We would like to work going into conference, work with the administration, work with the working groups to see if there is a better way of allocation that would still try to address the needs.
Chip Pickering: “The controversy here is over the allocation of whatever funds are available. The $26 million is greatly appreciated, but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funds related to the Self-Determination Act.
Share
More from Chip Pickering
I will be very brief. This amendment simply makes sure that the local companies and local communities in hurricane regions will lead the way in the preparation, cleanup, recovery and building for the next storm season. I want to thank the…
I do not see an inconsistency between willful blindness and a fleshing out of that. Was he aware of a high probability that a contribution originated from a foreign national? I do not see any inconsistency in that standard. It supports…
The high probability that the contribution originated from the foreign national would set the definition and the standard by what is responsible for those who are accepting and raising and soliciting foreign campaign contributions.
It is with malice toward none and forgiveness of individual failures, but with a love of the law and our country, I will vote for the articles of impeachment





