I do not see an inconsistency between willful blindness and a fleshing out of that. Was he aware of a high probability that a contribution originated from a foreign national? I do not see any inconsistency in that standard. It supports and, further, I think enhances the language of willful blindness. There may be a case to what court precedent does it refer to, what standard and what definition, but I do think that the high probability supports the intent.
Chip Pickering: “I do not see an inconsistency between willful blindness and a fleshing out of that. Was he aware of a high probability…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legal standards related to willful blindness and foreign contributions.
Share
More from Chip Pickering
The high probability, there would be a willfulness, and the willfulness would be determined in clause (b) by the probability that he should be aware. For example, when Vice President Gore went to the Buddhist monastery, should he have had…
I will be very brief. This amendment simply makes sure that the local companies and local communities in hurricane regions will lead the way in the preparation, cleanup, recovery and building for the next storm season. I want to thank the…
The high probability that the contribution originated from the foreign national would set the definition and the standard by what is responsible for those who are accepting and raising and soliciting foreign campaign contributions.
It could be done either way, as the litigation and the different challenges progress through the campaign FEC process and through the court process. But I do believe that we would find an answer to the gentleman's question as far as case…





