Sixty-seven percent of the people that committed an action did not have a consequence to their action.

You just do not take the timeline seriously.

I think we need to really take a good long look at why.

Do you believe that violent repeat, repeat, repeat offenders should be kept in jail?

I agree with you, but I think you are missing the point.

If you truly want to care about the American people and truly want to get your fiscal house in order... stop with the fear mongering.

Because, you know, anybody who has flown, everything is on time and nothing runs late, right? That is the first thing we are going to cut.

Too much money is going to administrators, bureaucrats feather their own nest, with WIOA money.

I think we need to change what is critical, why is infant formula not considered mission critical to the FDA?

It is amazing to me, and it saddens me a little bit, that we actually have to legislate this, but if that is what it takes to keep people safe, I mean it is a shame that we have to legislate.

The American people want us to do this. They want us to get this under control.

I am not going to start with the kids.

So, what I find troubling, disheartening, and if it wasn't factual, kind of comical, is what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want to cut.

So, a product with no substitute, to me, that sounds like baby formula, other than mother's breast milk, but some mothers cannot breastfeed for whatever reason.

They are going to cut, you know, food to children, and I think that that was one of the examples that Representative McClain used.

I think baby food is essential, especially in this day and age, and especially for underserved communities.

And baby formula is not prioritized, so maybe that is something else we need to change?

The first thing we are going to cut is WIC, my God. Now, forget about the $1.5 billion in tree planting.

We have to get spending under control.

Can we agree even if it is 5 of 21 and your numbers are correct, 5 of 21? What was everyone doing?

In my opinion, simply put, ESG is politization of investing and continues to be weaponized by the radical left.

In my opinion, ESG investments distribute money based on political agendas. That is not their job.

What is the harm in saying, hey, I entered into a pledge that requires me to do some ESG stuff?

I am all for people to have choice in where their money goes and what they look at, right?

in my opinion, ESG investments distribute money based on political agendas. That is not their job.