Finally, Mr. Chairman, the courts have held that a Federal statute will be deemed to invalidate, impair, or supersede State law whenever the State has regulated the same general subject within the business of insurance. Currently, all States specifically forbid unfair discrimination in the issuance or termination of property insurance. Thus, it appears that HUD's activities pursuant to the Fair Housing Act constitute a dual Federal-State system of regulating insurance discrimination, contrary to the letter and spirit of the McCarran- Ferguson act. Does the gentleman again concur that HUD's application of the Fair Housing Act to insurance is fundamentally at odds with McCarran- Ferguson?
Joseph Knollenberg: “Finally, Mr. Chairman, the courts have held that a Federal statute will be deemed to invalidate, impair, or supersede…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of HUD's actions under the Fair Housing Act on state insurance laws.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
Well, the whole point is that it isn't just one thing; it is two or three things that are the problem. Already, they are down $12 million. Then there is the possibility that yours would strike some more money. Finally, what do they do…
This will be a tremendous step toward protecting the American traveling public. It will move us away from a system of faith-based regulation and protection to one based on the rule of law and regulations.
Let me just say that one thing I don't quite understand about what is taking place here, but I want to get to the bottom of it. Having to provide a subsidy for empty units, and that is what you are doing, with a budget that only assumes…
Every one of these projects relative to the gentleman's comments, must relate to the eligibility of the CDBG program. Every single one. We don't waive the requirements. In fact, to show how worthwhile we think these projects are, for the…





