Well, the whole point is that it isn't just one thing; it is two or three things that are the problem. Already, they are down $12 million. Then there is the possibility that yours would strike some more money. Finally, what do they do about the servicing? How do they even get along with that situation when they know they are going to lose some people. They are going to lose some people.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
the bill before us fully funds the renewal of Section 8 vouchers. Additional funds, especially ones at the expense of critical programs, are simply not necessary. The cost of Section 8 vouchers are remaining constant and in some markets…
Madam Speaker, as we consider the rule for H.R. 3074, that's the bill, of course, that makes the appropriations for the Department of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, crafting the underlying bill before us has not been easy…
following the full committee amendment process, CBO's scoring of our bill resulted in slightly more than $20.7 million in savings. This amendment will place this funding in the IRS operations support account, which was reduced by $50…
I insist on my point of order, and I would like to respond in this fashion. I raise a point of order against the amendment. The amendment proposes to increase an appropriation not authorized by law and, therefore, is in violation of clause…
Other voices in this conversation
