He agreed that the EPA should not use appropriated funds for the purpose of issuing regulations to implement the Kyoto Protocol unless and until such treaty is ratified by the U.S. Senate. Both the House and the Senate strongly concur in that position, so it is a bit of a red herring for people to say that this legislation will hamstring EPA or hinder energy conservation and greenhouse gas reduction programs that are ongoing.
Discussing the Senate's position on EPA funding related to the Kyoto Protocol.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
Well, it states it in reverse, and that is my question. I thank you for the layout of the information here. You certainly raise an important issue, and I pledge to explore the issue with you further.
every one of these projects relative to the gentleman's comments, must relate to the eligibility of the CDBG program. Every single one. We don't waive the requirements. In fact, to show how worthwhile we think these projects are, for the…
at the end of the day, this creates an entitlement for vacant units. These funds are for tenant protection, not unit protection. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the…
I am pleased to say that I will support the conference report. The conference report has much to commend. We meet the majority of the transportation funding guarantee as mandated by SAFETEA-LU, plus included some wise legislative…
Other voices in this conversation
