we have just gone through an exercise talking about the rule of law. The White House has recently become remarkably solicitous of the privacy rights of convicted felons. While the coddling of criminals is nothing new for liberals, what is new is the idea that the White House cares about privacy rights for the law-abiding. I ask the White House, what about the privacy rights of the 900 Republicans whose FBI files ended up in the hands of political operatives in the White House? What about the privacy rights of Billy Dale and the other Travel Office employees? Rights which were trampled upon by the IRS and the FBI in a despicable smear campaign. In this strange new world, privacy rights are reserved for convicted criminals and denied to the innocent. Mr. Speaker, this entire episode is a perfect example of the liberal mindset when it comes to crime: Misplaced priorities, double standards, and always, always, always, preference for the rights of criminals over the rights of the law-abiding.
Joseph Knollenberg: “we have just gone through an exercise talking about the rule of law. The White House has recently become remarkably…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing privacy rights and the treatment of law-abiding citizens versus convicted felons.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
I recognize the difficult situation that some PHAs across the country are facing. Providing flexibility to housing agencies while at the same time ensuring that HUD can effectively manage its programs is a no-cost solution that, if…
I am pleased to say that I will support the conference report. The conference report has much to commend. We meet the majority of the transportation funding guarantee as mandated by SAFETEA-LU, plus included some wise legislative…
I do appreciate and share the concern that my colleagues have about abusive lending practices and the need to eliminate predatory lending by financial institutions. I also recognize that HUD has been working on a regulation for more than 3…
Well, the whole point is that it isn't just one thing; it is two or three things that are the problem. Already, they are down $12 million. Then there is the possibility that yours would strike some more money. Finally, what do they do…





