If someone showed up here and said, 'I am going to steal $3 billion from seniors in America,' I think there would be a lot of people pretty upset about it.

I very much take the point around this that perhaps our Federal agencies need to rethink how they evaluate this sort of stepped-in scam.

Are you moving toward trying to find a way to be able to disclose this to the AARP, or is that avenue right now just cut off?

Could you just speak very briefly to the potential impact of these cuts on your ability to enforce our Postal laws and protect our seniors from being scammed?

I just want to know, have you reached out, have you talked to the regulators about whether or not they, in fact, are examining the banks on this very question of how they deal with these scams when this money is moving through the American…

I'm very concerned about the revolving door that exists between the SEC and the private sector.

I think there has been a lot of transparency, and you have won widespread praise for both your balance and your judgment.

From the way I see how other agencies are treated, I see nothing here but a filibuster threat against Director Cordray as an attempt to weaken the consumer agency.

The American people deserve a Congress that worries less about helping big banks and more about helping regular people who have been cheated on mortgages, on credit cards, on student loans, on credit reports.

In your opinion, how many billions of dollars do you have to launder for drug lords before somebody says, 'We are shutting you down'?

the U.S. Government takes money laundering very seriously for a very good reason, and it puts very strong penalties in place.