I was surprised by your answer to Dr. Troske about the metric for success on the home mortgage foreclosure program.

The financial problems of these banks are straining their ability to lend to small businesses that might otherwise be driving the economic recovery.

I think your point about the accomplishments of TARP are quite significant and your emphasis on the importance of a stable, functional financial system is what I would like to talk about.

How can you be confident about the stability of these financial institutions without re-running the stress tests?

I have been calling for this for a while--is the creation of a homeowners advocate within the Treasury.

You set aside $50 billion and what do you have to show for it?

We must also evaluate whether Treasury has diligently measured the impact of its efforts, using credible metrics to measure the success or the failure of its programs.

The government had nothing to do with what happened in Long Term Capital Management?

I view this panel as an important vehicle through which the American people can gain assurances that this program was necessary and is being conducted in a manner that enhances the welfare of all citizens and not just a chosen few.

Following the bailout of a 100 cents on the dollar--because the Fed has described and they describe in their written testimony, it was totally binary.

AIG shareholders----