Rand Paul

In some ways it would probably be similar to sort of the certification of an election.

I hope it can remain so.

I think we are not going to find that the secrets to making a nuclear weapon were at someone's house.

the guards charged with protecting the very parchment our Bill of Rights is written on repeatedly violated the First Amendment rights of marchers in the presence of the actual First Amendment.

It looks as if there was a great deal of activity going after the Republicans and not so much for the Democrats.

In some ways it would probably be similar to sort of the certification of an election.

For the record here, on the Presidential controversy, what we are stuck with now is millions of dollars will be spent on these investigations, and there should be an investigation of neither Biden nor Trump nor Pence on this.

I think we are not going to find that the secrets to making a nuclear weapon were at someone's house.

It is quintessential First Amendment activity.

I think one of the things that American people hate most about government is when it appears as if justice or the adjudication of justice is partial.

It looks as if there was a great deal of activity going after the Republicans and not so much for the Democrats.

If someone said they disliked Rand Paul and he was a terrible Senator, they have to right to wear that T-shirt.

I hope it can remain so.

the guards charged with protecting the very parchment our Bill of Rights is written on repeatedly violated the First Amendment rights of marchers in the presence of the actual First Amendment.

It is hard to imagine a more offensive way to violate their freedom of speech.

The rules need to be the same for both parties, and it looks as if there was a great deal of activity going after the Republicans and not so much for the Democrats.

A lot of Republicans felt like there was a different standard really in the way the FBI treated Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

I was favorably inclined by your answer, particularly that your role as the Archivist is ministerial with regard to certifying amendments to the Constitution.

I think one of the things that American people hate most about government is when it appears as if justice or the adjudication of justice is partial.

You would not think that a scientific organization was resisting document disclosure, but they are.

It is quintessential First Amendment activity.

In some ways it would probably be similar to sort of the certification of an election.

Nothing like this can ever happen again, and we must understand who ordered it or tolerated it, and the culture that enabled this to happen.

I hope it can remain so.

I think we are not going to find that the secrets to making a nuclear weapon were at someone's house.