Well, some States would disagree with that. I've talked to many of them, and they view--even though you went through a process, that you set the standard.

So many critics say that that flexibility argument--we're giving maximum flexibility to the State--is really a red herring.

Why do you think the Supreme Court issued a stay of the Clean Power Plan?

EPA has created a de facto fuel and renewable energy standard for America.

27 States filed a lawsuit against the Clean Power Plan, and the Supreme Court issued a stay.

The Clean Power Plan was like picking up the Constitution and tearing it up.

During the almost 6 years that I have been chairman of this subcommittee, we've had 40 hearings that have looked at various EPA rules and proposals that affect or will affect the Nation's energy and industrial sectors.

This administration is engaged in favoritism as it pursues its carbon future for America.

Congress did not write the Clean Air Act to provide EPA with the ability to create new regulatory powers and authorities so it can transform the Nation's energy system.

EPA is pushing a back door cap-and-trade policy without congressional approval.

Despite the stay of the Clean Power Plan, last week EPA published a 44-page proposed rule setting forth the details for Clean Energy Incentive Program.