the problem with peer review is that you end up with a group of people all agreeing with each other.
It does not sound very objective.
Let us not say that it is not silly. It is silly.
There is a possibility these studies are not silly and we need better titles so they are not silly, or there is a possib...
I think we ought to consider that you should not get to pick the people approving your money.
I just see no reason at all taxpayer money would go to that, period.
That is absurd.
But the public reports have been that they have responded they are too big to be audited, or at least someone said that.
Thank you, Dr. Fichtner.
It is not the whole solution, but it could be a stepping stone toward trying to be more fiscally responsible.
I think as we begin this hearing, to put it into context, we are facing this year a $700 billion deficit.